ray.init() will currently start a new Ray instance even if one is already existing, which is very confusing if you are a new user trying to go from local development to a cluster. This PR changes it so that, when no address is specified, we first try to find an existing Ray cluster that was created through `ray start`. If none is found, we will start a new one.
This makes two changes to the ray.init() resolution order:
1. When `ray start` is called, the started cluster address was already written to a file called `/tmp/ray/ray_current_cluster`. For ray.init() and ray.init(address="auto"), we will first check this local file for an existing cluster address. The file is deleted on `ray stop`. If the file is empty, autodetect any running cluster (legacy behavior) if address="auto", or we will start a new local Ray instance if address=None.
2. When ray.init(address="local") is called, we will create a new local Ray instance, even if one is already existing. This behavior seems to be necessary mainly for `ray.client` use cases.
This also surfaces the logs about which Ray instance we are connecting to. Previously these were hidden because we didn't set up the log until after connecting to Ray. So now Ray will log one of the following messages during ray.init:
```
(Connecting to existing Ray cluster at address: <IP>...)
...connection...
(Started a local Ray cluster.| Connected to Ray Cluster.)( View the dashboard at <URL>)
```
Note that this changes the dashboard URL to be printed with `ray.init()` instead of when the dashboard is first started.
Co-authored-by: Eric Liang <ekhliang@gmail.com>
Enable checking of the ray core module, excluding serve, workflows, and tune, in ./ci/lint/check_api_annotations.py. This required moving many files to ray._private and associated fixes.
This makes it possible to use an NFS file system that is shared on a cluster for runtime_env working directories.
Co-authored-by: shrekris-anyscale <92341594+shrekris-anyscale@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Liang <ekhliang@gmail.com>
Currently job drivers cannot use GPUs due to `CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` being set (no resource request for job driver's supervisor actor). This is a regression from `ray submit`.
This is a temporary workaround -- in the future we should support a resource request for the job supervisor actor.
Adds an API to the REST server, the SDK, and the CLI for listing all jobs that have been submitted, along with their information.
Co-authored-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com>
The existing Job info in the cluster snapshot uses the old definition of Job, which is a single Ray driver (a single `ray.init()` connection).
In the new Job Submission protocol, a Job just specifies an entrypoint which can be any shell command. As such a Job can have zero or multiple Ray drivers. This means we should add a new snapshot entry corresponding to new jobs. We'll leave the old snapshot in place for legacy jobs.
- Also fixes `get_all_jobs` by using the appropriate KV namespace, and stripping the job key KV prefix from the job ID. It wasn't working before.
- This PR also unifies the datatype used by the GET jobs/ endpoint to be the same as the one used by the new jobs cluster snapshot. For backwards compatibility, the `status` and `message` fields are preserved.
For public SDK APIs, change the import path from
```python
from ray.dashboard.modules.job.common import JobStatus, JobStatusInfo
from ray.dashboard.modules.job.sdk import JobSubmissionClient
```
to
```python
from ray.job_submission import JobStatus, JobSubmissionClient
```
`JobStatus`, `JobStatusInfo` and `JobSubmissionClient` were the only names referenced in the SDK doc so far, but we can add more later as they appear.
As titled. We have a corner case on user laptop where user might left RAY_ADDRESS as http address but restarted local ray cluster. In this case we will try to do job submission with an http prefixed address.
Co-authored-by: Archit Kulkarni <architkulkarni@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiao Dong <jiaodong@anyscale.com>
Current logs API simply returns a str to unblock development and integration. We should add proper log streaming for better UX and external job manager integration.
Co-authored-by: Sven Mika <sven@anyscale.io>
Co-authored-by: sven1977 <svenmika1977@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ed Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Liaw <rliaw@berkeley.edu>
Co-authored-by: Simon Mo <simon.mo@hey.com>
Co-authored-by: Avnish Narayan <38871737+avnishn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiao Dong <jiaodong@anyscale.com>