The following diagram provides a conceptual overview of data flow between different components in RLlib. We start with an ``Environment``, which given an action produces an observation. The observation is preprocessed by a ``Preprocessor`` and ``Filter`` (e.g. for running mean normalization) before being sent to a neural network ``Model``. The model output is in turn interpreted by an ``ActionDistribution`` to determine the next action.
..image:: rllib-components.svg
The components highlighted in green can be replaced with custom user-defined implementations, as described in the next sections. The purple components are RLlib internal, which means they can only be modified by changing the algorithm source code.
RLlib picks default models based on a simple heuristic: a `vision network <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/visionnet.py>`__ for image observations, and a `fully connected network <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/fcnet.py>`__ for everything else. These models can be configured via the ``model`` config key, documented in the model `catalog <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/catalog.py>`__. Note that you'll probably have to configure ``conv_filters`` if your environment observations have custom sizes, e.g., ``"model": {"dim": 42, "conv_filters": [[16, [4, 4], 2], [32, [4, 4], 2], [512, [11, 11], 1]]}`` for 42x42 observations.
In addition, if you set ``"model": {"use_lstm": true}``, then the model output will be further processed by a `LSTM cell <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/lstm.py>`__. More generally, RLlib supports the use of recurrent models for its policy gradient algorithms (A3C, PPO, PG, IMPALA), and RNN support is built into its policy evaluation utilities.
For preprocessors, RLlib tries to pick one of its built-in preprocessor based on the environment's observation space. Discrete observations are one-hot encoded, Atari observations downscaled, and Tuple and Dict observations flattened (these are unflattened and accessible via the ``input_dict`` parameter in custom models). Note that for Atari, RLlib defaults to using the `DeepMind preprocessors <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/env/atari_wrappers.py>`__, which are also used by the OpenAI baselines library.
Custom TF models should subclass the common RLlib `model class <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/model.py>`__ and override the ``_build_layers_v2`` method. This method takes in a dict of tensor inputs (the observation ``obs``, ``prev_action``, and ``prev_reward``, ``is_training``), and returns a feature layer and float vector of the specified output size. You can also override the ``value_function`` method to implement a custom value branch. Additional supervised / self-supervised losses can be added via the ``custom_loss`` method. The model can then be registered and used in place of a built-in model:
Keras custom models are not compatible with multi-GPU (this includes PPO in single-GPU mode). This is because the multi-GPU implementation in RLlib relies on variable scopes to implement cross-GPU support.
For a full example of a custom model in code, see the `custom env example <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/examples/custom_env.py>`__. You can also reference the `unit tests <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/tests/test_nested_spaces.py>`__ for Tuple and Dict spaces, which show how to access nested observation fields.
Instead of using the ``use_lstm: True`` option, it can be preferable use a custom recurrent model. This provides more control over postprocessing of the LSTM output and can also allow the use of multiple LSTM cells to process different portions of the input. The only difference from a normal custom model is that you have to define ``self.state_init``, ``self.state_in``, and ``self.state_out``. You can refer to the existing `lstm.py <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/lstm.py>`__ model as an example to implement your own model:
You can use ``tf.layers.batch_normalization(x, training=input_dict["is_training"])`` to add batch norm layers to your custom model: `code example <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/examples/batch_norm_model.py>`__. RLlib will automatically run the update ops for the batch norm layers during optimization (see `tf_policy.py <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/policy/tf_policy.py>`__ and `multi_gpu_impl.py <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/optimizers/multi_gpu_impl.py>`__ for the exact handling of these updates).
Similarly, you can create and register custom PyTorch models for use with PyTorch-based algorithms (e.g., A2C, PG, QMIX). See these examples of `fully connected <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/pytorch/fcnet.py>`__, `convolutional <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/pytorch/visionnet.py>`__, and `recurrent <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/agents/qmix/model.py>`__ torch models.
Custom preprocessors should subclass the RLlib `preprocessor class <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/preprocessors.py>`__ and be registered in the model catalog. Note that you can alternatively use `gym wrapper classes <https://github.com/openai/gym/tree/master/gym/wrappers>`__ around your environment instead of preprocessors.
You can mix supervised losses into any RLlib algorithm through custom models. For example, you can add an imitation learning loss on expert experiences, or a self-supervised autoencoder loss within the model. These losses can be defined over either policy evaluation inputs, or data read from `offline storage <rllib-offline.html#input-pipeline-for-supervised-losses>`__.
**TensorFlow**: To add a supervised loss to a custom TF model, you need to override the ``custom_loss()`` method. This method takes in the existing policy loss for the algorithm, which you can add your own supervised loss to before returning. For debugging, you can also return a dictionary of scalar tensors in the ``custom_metrics()`` method. Here is a `runnable example <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/examples/custom_loss.py>`__ of adding an imitation loss to CartPole training that is defined over a `offline dataset <rllib-offline.html#input-pipeline-for-supervised-losses>`__.
**PyTorch**: There is no explicit API for adding losses to custom torch models. However, you can modify the loss in the policy definition directly. Like for TF models, offline datasets can be incorporated by creating an input reader and calling ``reader.next()`` in the loss forward pass.
Custom models can be used to work with environments where (1) the set of valid actions `varies per step <https://neuro.cs.ut.ee/the-use-of-embeddings-in-openai-five>`__, and/or (2) the number of valid actions is `very large <https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00260>`__. The general idea is that the meaning of actions can be completely conditioned on the observation, i.e., the ``a`` in ``Q(s, a)`` becomes just a token in ``[0, MAX_AVAIL_ACTIONS)`` that only has meaning in the context of ``s``. This works with algorithms in the `DQN and policy-gradient families <rllib-env.html>`__ and can be implemented as follows:
1. The environment should return a mask and/or list of valid action embeddings as part of the observation for each step. To enable batching, the number of actions can be allowed to vary from 1 to some max number:
2. A custom model can be defined that can interpret the ``action_mask`` and ``avail_actions`` portions of the observation. Here the model computes the action logits via the dot product of some network output and each action embedding. Invalid actions can be masked out of the softmax by scaling the probability to zero:
Depending on your use case it may make sense to use just the masking, just action embeddings, or both. For a runnable example of this in code, check out `parametric_action_cartpole.py <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/examples/parametric_action_cartpole.py>`__. Note that since masking introduces ``tf.float32.min`` values into the model output, this technique might not work with all algorithm options. For example, algorithms might crash if they incorrectly process the ``tf.float32.min`` values. The cartpole example has working configurations for DQN (must set ``hiddens=[]``), PPO (must disable running mean and set ``vf_share_layers=True``), and several other algorithms.
For deeper customization of algorithms, you can modify the policies of the trainer classes. Here's an example of extending the DDPG policy to specify custom sub-network modules:
In this example we overrode existing methods of the existing DDPG policy, i.e., `_build_q_network`, `_build_p_network`, `_build_action_network`, `_build_actor_critic_loss`, but you can also replace the entire graph class entirely.
With a custom policy, you can also perform model-based rollouts and optionally incorporate the results of those rollouts as training data. For example, suppose you wanted to extend PGPolicy for model-based rollouts. This involves overriding the ``compute_actions`` method of that policy:
If you want take this rollouts data and append it to the sample batch, use the ``add_extra_batch()`` method of the `episode objects <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/evaluation/episode.py>`__ passed in. For an example of this, see the ``testReturningModelBasedRolloutsData```unit test <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/tests/test_multi_agent_env.py>`__.