From b0cc72b6bbd1c3200b31667effc9c525e25d3602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Cumming Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:47:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in outline.md --- outline.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/outline.md b/outline.md index 9562a4b..e059647 100644 --- a/outline.md +++ b/outline.md @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ The homework will be graded according to the following rubric: 0. No meaningful attempt made at a solution (no code, unrelated code, non-functional code whose function is hard to determine). 1. Part of an answer provided / a plan or idea for a solution is discernible. Partly functional code that can be understood and forms the beginnings of a solution. 2. An understanding of the problem and a concrete idea for an answer / code implementation is present. Code is almost functional and understandable, but does not fully solve the problem. Alternatively, there is a complete working code but the code is hard to understand (poor style or commenting). -3. Demonstrates a clear understanding of the problem and it's solution. Working *clear* code, or non-working code with a clear explanation of what the problem with it may be. +3. Demonstrates a clear understanding of the problem and its solution. Working *clear* code, or non-working code with a clear explanation of what the problem with it may be. ## McGill policy statements