mirror of
https://github.com/vale981/master-thesis
synced 2025-03-04 17:41:43 -05:00
project update
This commit is contained in:
parent
818285d70f
commit
7053d2ec1d
1 changed files with 26 additions and 35 deletions
61
project.org
61
project.org
|
@ -29,30 +29,7 @@ See [[id:f8d8a28b-7ae3-425a-921e-8f472b166866][Numerics]]
|
|||
- [[id:eb435d2d-2625-4219-ae18-224eba0fa8a4][Coherent States]]
|
||||
|
||||
* Todo
|
||||
** DONE Where is stochastic unraveling explained in more detail?
|
||||
- maybe in sources 1-7 in the cite:Diosi1997
|
||||
1. cite:Diosi1995Jan
|
||||
- wait for hab...
|
||||
** RESOLVED Ito formalism necessary?
|
||||
** RESOLVED the stochastic calculus...
|
||||
** DONE understanding NMQSD
|
||||
** DONE How are gaussian processes described by their autocorellation
|
||||
** DONE Which mean is meant in the [[id:85fc22ad-ad87-4f6e-a395-00c6fb33f263][Bath Correlation Function]]?
|
||||
- ok mean in initial state
|
||||
** DONE What is the justification for substitutiong zt for a stochastic process?
|
||||
- actually we do not really substitute -> the sample trajectories /are/ a stoch. process
|
||||
** DONE Why in the first place? -> sampling -> but why processes
|
||||
** DONE The langevin eq. for Q in cite:Strunz2001Habil is NO LANGEVIN equation?!
|
||||
- well sort of. the solution is correct
|
||||
** DONE Mathematical nitpicks in cite:Strunz2001Habil
|
||||
** DONE IN cite:Strunz2001Habil this is meant as integral over initial conditions?
|
||||
** ASK [[id:c55b6bac-87e3-4b23-a238-c9135e3c1371][Quantum Fluctuation theorems?]]
|
||||
** DONE Submit stocproc and ... patches
|
||||
** ASK Only β dependence in Rivas H from definition, or also through time development?
|
||||
** ASK Nonlinear woes!
|
||||
- derivative of D operator?
|
||||
- Heisenberg Method can't work. At least it's no linear operator
|
||||
- ahh [[file:calca/nmqsd_doodles/nonlin_heisenberg.xoj][see the end of my notes]]
|
||||
** RESEARCH [[id:c55b6bac-87e3-4b23-a238-c9135e3c1371][Quantum Fluctuation theorems?]]
|
||||
* Tasks
|
||||
** DONE Implement Basic HOPS
|
||||
:LOGBOOK:
|
||||
|
@ -76,14 +53,8 @@ CLOCK: [2021-10-07 Thu 13:38]--[2021-10-07 Thu 17:50] => 4:12
|
|||
*** DONE TeX notes
|
||||
- done with nonlinear
|
||||
*** TODO verify that second hops state vanishes
|
||||
*** DONE Try to get Richards old HOPS working
|
||||
- code downloaded from [[https://cloudstore.zih.tu-dresden.de/index.php/s/9sdcn3FGGbDMDoj][here]]
|
||||
- it works see [[file:python/richard_hops/energy_flow.org][Energy Flow]]
|
||||
- interestingly with this model: only one aux state
|
||||
*** DONE Test Nonlinear hops
|
||||
- see [[file:python/richard_hops/energy_flow_nonlinear.org][here]]
|
||||
*** TODO Generalize to two Baths
|
||||
- bath-bath correlations
|
||||
*** NEXT Adapt New HOPS
|
||||
- [[id:64c775a3-860e-479d-8b08-904dc210991d][Strong coupling thermodynamics of open quantum systems]]
|
||||
*** TODO Generalize to Nonzero Temp
|
||||
- in cite:RichardDiss the noise hamiltonian method is described
|
||||
- b.c. only on system -> calculation should go through :)
|
||||
|
@ -93,6 +64,15 @@ CLOCK: [2021-10-07 Thu 13:38]--[2021-10-07 Thu 17:50] => 4:12
|
|||
- not as bad as thought: no exponential form needed -> process smooth
|
||||
- [[file:calca/heat_flow/nonzero_t_no_time_derivative.xoj][one can get around the time derivative]]
|
||||
- i have implemented finite temperature [[file:python/richard_hops/energy_flow_thermal.org][here]]
|
||||
**** TODO Think about transform
|
||||
*** DONE Try to get Richards old HOPS working
|
||||
- code downloaded from [[https://cloudstore.zih.tu-dresden.de/index.php/s/9sdcn3FGGbDMDoj][here]]
|
||||
- it works see [[file:python/richard_hops/energy_flow.org][Energy Flow]]
|
||||
- interestingly with this model: only one aux state
|
||||
*** DONE Test Nonlinear hops
|
||||
- see [[file:python/richard_hops/energy_flow_nonlinear.org][here]]
|
||||
*** TODO Generalize to two Baths
|
||||
- bath-bath correlations
|
||||
*** TODO Analytic Verification
|
||||
- cummings
|
||||
- and pseudo-mode
|
||||
|
@ -115,9 +95,20 @@ CLOCK: [2021-10-07 Thu 13:38]--[2021-10-07 Thu 17:50] => 4:12
|
|||
- Initial time: \(E_{\text {int }}(0):=\operatorname{Tr}\left[\rho_{\mathrm{S}}(0) H_{\mathrm{S}}\right] \quad\left(H_{\mathrm{S}}^{\circledast}(0, \beta)=H_{\mathrm{S}}\right)\)
|
||||
*** TODO Compare with Rivas Method
|
||||
*** DONE Find Rivas Paper
|
||||
*** TODO Make proper library
|
||||
*** TODO Adapt New HOPS
|
||||
- [[id:64c775a3-860e-479d-8b08-904dc210991d][Strong coupling thermodynamics of open quantum systems]]
|
||||
*** NEXT Make proper library
|
||||
*** TODO Three Bath Fridge
|
||||
**** Mail from Konstantin
|
||||
here is the paper I had in mind when we talked about the three-bath fridge.
|
||||
|
||||
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.070604
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know if this scenario has been considered in a strong coupling framework.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This fridge is working continuously. Maybe for HOPS a stroke-based model could be better to avoid long propagation to the steady state. Just as an example, here is an Otto-Fridge with strong coupling (I have not thou thoroughly read this paper)
|
||||
|
||||
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140%2Fepjs%2Fs11734-021-00094-0
|
||||
** Find the Steady State
|
||||
** Matrix Eigenvals
|
||||
- see cite:Pan1999May
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue