fix "in refs...."

hirostyle.sty

@@ -82,4 +82,30 @@ linkcolor=blue,
 % cursive bold in maths
 \unimathsetup{math-style=TeX,bold-style=ISO}
 
+%% citing "in ref"
+\NewBibliographyString{refname}
+\NewBibliographyString{refsname}
+\DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
+  refname = {Ref\adddot},
+  refsname = {Refs\adddot}
+}
+
+\DeclareCiteCommand{\refcite}
+  {%
+  \ifnum\thecitetotal=1
+    \bibstring{refname}%
+  \else%
+    \bibstring{refsname}%
+  \fi%
+  \addspace\bibopenbracket%
+  \usebibmacro{cite:init}%
+   \usebibmacro{prenote}}
+  {\usebibmacro{citeindex}%
+   \usebibmacro{cite:comp}}
+  {}
+  {\usebibmacro{cite:dump}%
+   \usebibmacro{postnote}%
+   \bibclosebracket}
+
+
 \recalctypearea

src/analytical_solution.tex

@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ temperature, as we are working in the Heisenberg picture.
 For completeness, it may be of interest to find a solution for
 negative times. This solution is relatively unphysical, as the initial
 condition of a product state\footnote{For a treatment of more general
-  initial states see \cite{Grabert1988Oct}.} plays a pivotal role in
+  initial states see \refcite{Grabert1988Oct}.} plays a pivotal role in
 open system dynamics~\cite{Rivas2012}. Therefore a system that starts
 out in some entangled state just to reach the perfect product state at
 \(t=0\) is not something that is likely to be applicable to physical

src/flow.tex

@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ through energy conservation as in~\cite{Kato2016Dec}, we find
   H_\inter^{(n)}]}
 \end{equation}
 regardless of the (non-) commutativity\footnote{For example, the
-  three-level model used in \cite{Uzdin2015Sep,Klatzow2019Mar} has
+  three-level model used in \refcite{Uzdin2015Sep,Klatzow2019Mar} has
   non-commuting couplings.} of the interaction
 Hamiltonians. Therefore, we can apply the formalism of the previous
 sections almost unchanged, by taking care that all quantities involved

src/intro.tex

@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ This leads to the nonlinear NMQSD equation~\cite{Diosi1998Mar}
     -\ev{L^\dag}_{t}}∫_0^t\dd{s}α(t-s)\fdv{\ket{ψ({\tilde{η}}^\ast_t, t)}}{\tilde{η}^\ast_s}.
 \end{equation}
 There is a subtlety concerning the functional derivative that won't be
-discussed here but in \cite{Hartmann2021Aug,RichardDiss} or
+discussed here but in \refcite{Hartmann2021Aug,RichardDiss} or
 \cref{sec:nonlin_flow}.  Crucially, the system state is now recovered
 through
 \begin{equation}

src/num_results.tex

@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ with specific bath degrees of freedom which are independent themselves
 except for their interaction with the system.
 
 This interpretation is corroborated by a time discrete version of the
-NMQSD discussed in \cite{RichardDiss}. There, the
+NMQSD discussed in \refcite{RichardDiss}. There, the
 \emph{Time-Oscillator picture} is introduced, which shows that a
 variant of the NMQSD can be formulated as the successive interaction
 in time of the system with mode like degrees of freedom. At each time
@@ -1474,9 +1474,9 @@ Note that the short time behaviour discussed here can usually not be
 resolved by the usual Markovian master equations. This is due to the
 fact, that the bath timescale \(\sim 1/ω_{c}\) must be by far the
 shortest, which often isn't the case here. Another demonstration of
-this fact is given in \cite{Link2022Feb}, where Markovian dynamics are
+this fact is given in \refcite{Link2022Feb}, where Markovian dynamics are
 compared with the Redfield and exact dynamics for the spin-boson model
-coupled to a squeezed bath. As in \cite{Xu2022Mar}, the Redfield
+coupled to a squeezed bath. As in \refcite{Xu2022Mar}, the Redfield
 description is found to be adequate for weak coupling. This is due to
 the Redfield master equation not requiring the secular approximation,
 but only weak coupling. It can therefore faithfully capture

src/outro.tex

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 \chapter{Conclusion and Ideas for future Work}
 \label{cha:concl-ideas-future}
 A worthwhile task for future work would be to verify the results
-summarized in \cite{Binder2018} for the Otto cycle. Especially the
+summarized in \refcite{Binder2018} for the Otto cycle. Especially the
 optimization for optimal power which leads to the
 Novikov–Curzon–Ahlborn efficiency \(η_{ca}=1-\sqrt{T_{c}/T_{h}}\) is
 interesting in the case of stronger coupling.
@@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ studying the effect of overlapping and shifting strokes is a
 fascinating avenue for future exploration.
 
 Also, more interesting working media, such as a three level system are
-of interest. In \cite{Uzdin2015Sep} it is shown, that in certain
+of interest. In \refcite{Uzdin2015Sep} it is shown, that in certain
 regimes quantum coherence can lead to superior power output. In the
 same regime different types heat engines are equivalent. Both these
-effects have been observed experimentally in \cite{Klatzow2019Mar}. It
+effects have been observed experimentally in \refcite{Klatzow2019Mar}. It
 would be interesting to see if the slight deviations from theory in
 \cite{Klatzow2019Mar} could be explained using HOPS.
 
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ consequence of the energy time uncertainty it is being argued, that
 the origin of this advantage is truly quantum. The tools for the
 exploitation of this effect and its verification are provided in this
 work. However, a strong coupling analysis has already been performed
-using HEOM in \cite{Xu2022Mar}.
+using HEOM in \refcite{Xu2022Mar}.
 
-In \cite{Santos2021Jun} a cycle is proposed that first creates states
+In \refcite{Santos2021Jun} a cycle is proposed that first creates states
 of finite ergotropy by letting energy flow through the working medium
 and then extracting this ergotropy in a separate stroke. This work
 could be verified and expanded to the non-Markovian regime.

src/thermo.tex

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ passive iff the maximizing \(U\) \cref{eq:ergo_def} is the identity
 \(\id\). In other words, a state is passive if its energy can not be
 reduced through unitary transformations and its ergotropy vanishes.
 
-In \cite{Niedenzu2018Jan} the ergotropy of the system is employed for
+In \refcite{Niedenzu2018Jan} the ergotropy of the system is employed for
 the definition of heat to derive a tighter second law.  The immediate
 appeal of this quantity for the purposes of this work however is its
 to the full unitary dynamics of system \emph{and} bath which is
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ relaxed, as \cref{eq:secondlaw_cyclic} holds as soon as
 \(ΔS_\sys^\cyc\) vanishes.
 
 The left hand side could be called ``bath entropy production'' as is
-motivated in \cite{Riechers2021Apr}, where heat is identified with
+motivated in \refcite{Riechers2021Apr}, where heat is identified with
 \(ΔE_{\bath^i}\). There, the entropy production bound
 \cref{eq:bathenergyandsystementro} that takes into account system and
 bath is being considered and brought into connection with
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ densities have been shifted such that their maxima coincide with
 \(1 + Δ\) which relates to \cref{sec:energy-transf-char}. The
 resonance criterion for modulated systems is derived from Floquet
 theory~\cite{Kurizki2021Dec} which once again is a weak coupling
-result, that carries over to other regimes. In \cite{Xu2022Mar} it is
+result, that carries over to other regimes. In \refcite{Xu2022Mar} it is
 shown, that for stronger coupling the situation is more complicated
 but that, just like in \cref{sec:energy-transf-char}, the resonance
 criterion is still a good starting point.