make the wrapfigures normal figures (for now)

src/num_results.tex

@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ qualitatively different steady state than the one with the same cutoff
 but weaker coupling strength (green line). This also manifests in a
 higher expected system energy in the steady state.
 
-\begin{wrapfigure}[-4]{O}{0.4\textwidth}*
+\begin{figure}[htp]
   \centering
   \includegraphics{figs/analytic_comp/timescale_comparison}
   \caption{\label{fig:timescale_comp} A comparison of bath vs
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ higher expected system energy in the steady state.
     \(\sqrt{α(0)}/ω_{c}\sim τ_{\bath}/τ_{\inter}\) for the simulations
     in \cref{fig:ho_zero_entropy}. The orange line is set far apart
     from the other simulations.}
-\end{wrapfigure}
+\end{figure}
 The time dependence of the system entropy and the system energy
 expectation value is markedly different for the cutoff \(ω_c=3\)
 (orange line). Although the coupling strength is similar to the
@@ -1053,12 +1053,12 @@ by
 \end{equation}
 where \(ω_{s} > 0\).
 
-\begin{wrapfigure}[-1]{O}{0.3\textwidth}*
+\begin{figure}[htp]
   \centering
   \includegraphics{figs/one_bath_syst/L_mod}
   \caption{\label{fig:L_mod} The smooth modulation of the coupling
     operator \(L(τ)\).}
-\end{wrapfigure}
+\end{figure}
 Also, we turn off the interaction smoothly\footnote{A smoothstep
   function of order two with a transition period of two. See
   \cref{sec:smoothstep}.} over two time units (see \cref{fig:L_mod})
@@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ to future work.
 % some part of the negative interaction energy. In this way, the removal
 % of the bath would
 
-\begin{wrapfigure}[-1]{O}{0.4\textwidth}*
+\begin{figure}[htp]
   \centering
   \includegraphics{figs/one_bath_syst/initial_slip_resonance}
   \caption{\label{fig:initial_slip_resonance} The interaction energies
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ to future work.
     dynamics \cref{eq:pureinterexp_timeidp} (dashed lines). Larger
     frequency shifts of the spectral density lead to a higher
     magnitude of the interaction energy and faster dynamics.}
-\end{wrapfigure}
+\end{figure}
 As a heuristic observation, the maximal absolute interaction energy
 is roughly proportional to the shift \(ω_{s}\) of the spectral
 density, so that the short term interaction strength as measured by
@@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@ coupling strengths in \cref{sec:one_bathcoup_strength}.
 
 \subsection{Varying the Coupling Strength}%
 \label{sec:one_bathcoup_strength}
-\begin{wrapfigure}[-2]{o}{0.3\textwidth}*
+\begin{figure}[htp]
   \centering
   \includegraphics{figs/one_bath_syst/final_states_flows}
   \caption{\label{fig:delta_fs_flow} The absolute value difference of
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ coupling strengths in \cref{sec:one_bathcoup_strength}.
     \cref{fig:delta_energy_overview} from their value at coupling
     strength \(α(0)=0.40\) normalized by their value at
     \(α(0)=1.12\).}
-\end{wrapfigure}
+\end{figure}
 After having studied the dependence of the bath energy flow for
 various cutoff frequencies of the BCF in \cref{sec:one_bath_cutoff},
 we now consider the case with fixed cutoff \(ω_c=2\) but varying
@@ -1666,14 +1666,14 @@ upon the bath energy change due to the initial slip, is the subject of
 
 \subsection{Moderating the Inital Slip with Modulated Coupling}%
 \label{sec:moder-init-slip}
-\begin{wrapfigure}[-2]{o}{0.4\textwidth}*
+\begin{figure}[htp]
   \centering
   \includegraphics{figs/one_bath_mod/modulation_protocols_init.pdf}
   \caption{\label{fig:L_mod_init} The interaction is being switched on
     smoothly over a period of \(8\) time units by the use of
     smoothstep functions (\cref{sec:smoothstep}) of different
     orders. A sudden protocol is being included for reference.}
-\end{wrapfigure}
+\end{figure}
 In \cref{sec:pure_deph} we derived the short term behavior of the
 interaction dynamics by neglecting the system Hamiltonian. Up to now
 we only have looked at the scenario in which the interaction is