mirror of
https://github.com/vale981/master-thesis-tex
synced 2025-03-04 17:21:37 -05:00
fix norm of k
This commit is contained in:
parent
69d7d1db6f
commit
58cf4c1e88
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ deviation.
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
The simulation was run with a hierarchy depth of
|
||||
\(\norm{\vb{k}} \leq 5\) (simplex truncation\footnote{see
|
||||
\(\abs{\vb{k}} \leq 5\) (simplex truncation\footnote{see
|
||||
\cref{sec:hops_basics}}) and a BCF fit with \(7\) terms taken from
|
||||
\cite{RichardDiss} which was also used in the analytical solution. The
|
||||
harmonic oscillator Hilbert space was truncated to \(15\) dimensions
|
||||
|
@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ frequency is smaller and the bath has a longer memory.
|
|||
\subsection{Stochastic Process}
|
||||
\label{sec:stocproc}
|
||||
For studying the convergence behaviour in reference to the sampling of
|
||||
the stochastic process we chose the cutoff \(\norm{\vb{k}} \leq 4\)
|
||||
the stochastic process we chose the cutoff \(\abs{\vb{k}} \leq 4\)
|
||||
(simplex truncation\footnote{see \cref{sec:hops_basics}}),
|
||||
\(N=4.5 \cdot 10^5\) trajectories and an Ohmic BCF with \(α(0)=1.6\)
|
||||
and \(ω_c=4\). The sampling method uses the ``Fast Fourier
|
||||
|
@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ Ohmic BCF with \(α(0)=0.8\) and \(ω_c=2\). Again, a BCF expansion with
|
|||
seven terms has been used. The coupling strength has been chosen with
|
||||
the help of \cref{sec:pure_deph}, so that the interaction energy is of
|
||||
a similar order of magnitude as in the discussion above. The
|
||||
simulation was run with \(k=\norm{\vb{k}}\in \{2,4,6\}\).
|
||||
simulation was run with \(k=\abs{\vb{k}}=∑_{i}k_{i}=\in \{2,4,6\}\).
|
||||
|
||||
\Cref{fig:k_systematics} suggests that there is to be no improvement
|
||||
in accuracy or even change in the value of the flow for
|
||||
|
@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ truncation depth is important.
|
|||
\includegraphics{figs/one_bath_syst/k_systematics_interaction}
|
||||
\caption{\label{fig:k_systematics} The same as
|
||||
\cref{fig:stocproc_systematics} but for \(α(0)=0.8\) and
|
||||
\(ω_c=2\) and for various truncation depths \(k=\norm{\vb{k}}_{\mathrm{max}}\).}
|
||||
\(ω_c=2\) and for various truncation depths \(k=\abs{\vb{k}}_{\mathrm{max}}\).}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
We see in \cref{fig:k_systematics_system} that the difference of the
|
||||
|
@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ of the model. The quantification of the initial slip dynamics in
|
|||
To make the interaction energies comparable to each other, the BCF
|
||||
normalization of \cref{sec:pure_deph} is being used. Because of the
|
||||
small size of the Hilbert space, we were able to choose a HOPS
|
||||
configuration\footnote{\(\norm{\vb{k}}\leq 7\), seven BCF terms,
|
||||
configuration\footnote{\(\abs{\vb{k}}\leq 7\), seven BCF terms,
|
||||
\(\varsigma = 10^{-6}\)} that yields high-accuracy results, based on
|
||||
the results of the previous section. The only problematic result is
|
||||
the one for the cutoff \(ω_c=1\), but there is good qualitative
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue