fix weird formulation

src/num_results.tex

@@ -863,12 +863,11 @@ the help of \cref{sec:pure_deph}, so that the interaction energy is of
 a similar order of magnitude as in the discussion above. The
 simulation was run with \(k=\abs{\vb{k}}=∑_{i}k_{i}\in \{2,4,6\}\).
 
-\Cref{fig:k_systematics} suggests that there is to be no improvement
-in accuracy or even change in the value of the flow for
-\(k\geq 4\). However, the inset in the left panel
-demonstrates that the direct result differs slightly for
-\(k = 2\), which demonstrates that an adequate choice of
-truncation depth is important.
+\Cref{fig:k_systematics} suggests that there is no improvement in
+accuracy or even change in the value of the flow for \(k\geq
+4\). However, the inset in the left panel demonstrates that the direct
+result differs slightly for \(k = 2\), which demonstrates that an
+adequate choice of truncation depth is important.
 \begin{figure}[htp]
   \centering
   \includegraphics{figs/one_bath_syst/k_systematics_interaction}