\section{Discussion and Comparison with \sherpa}% \label{sec:compsher} The result obtained in \cref{sec:qqggcalc} shall now be verified by the monte-carlo event generator \sherpa{}~\cite{Gleisberg:2008ta}. To facilitate this, an expression for the total cross section for a range of \(\theta\) or \(\eta\) has to be obtained. Using the golden rule for \(2\rightarrow 2\) processes and observing that the initial and final momenta are equal (\(p_i=p_f\)) and \(g=\sqrt{4\pi\alpha}\), the result \cref{eq:crossec} arises. The differential cross section has also been calculated in terms of the pseudo-rapidity in \cref{eq:xs-eta}. An additional factor of \(\frac{1}{2}\) comes in due to there being two identical photons in the final state. \begin{equation} \label{eq:crossec} \dv{\sigma}{\Omega} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{(8\pi)^2}\cdot\frac{\abs{\mathcal{M}}^2}{\ecm^2}\cdot\frac{\abs{p_f}}{\abs{p_i}} = \underbrace{\frac{\alpha^2Z^4}{6\ecm^2}}_{\mathfrak{C}}\frac{1+\cos^2(\theta)}{\sin^2(\theta)} \end{equation} \begin{equation} \label{eq:xs-eta} \dv{\sigma}{\eta} = 2\pi\cdot\frac{\alpha^2Z^4}{6\ecm^2}\cdot\qty(\tanh(\eta)^2 + 1) \end{equation} \begin{figure}[ht] \centering \begin{subfigure}[c]{.45\textwidth} \centering \plot{xs/diff_xs} \caption[Plot of the differential cross section of the \(\qqgg\) process.]{\label{fig:diffxs} The differential cross section as a function of the polar angle \(\theta\). } \end{subfigure} \begin{subfigure}[c]{.45\textwidth} \centering \plot{xs/total_xs} \caption[Plot of the total cross section of the \(\qqgg\) process.]{\label{fig:totxs} The total cross section (\cref{eq:total-crossec}) of the process for a pseudo-rapidity range of \([-\eta, \eta]\).} \end{subfigure} \end{figure} The differential cross section \cref{eq:crossec} (see also \cref{fig:diffxs}) is divergent for angles near zero or \(\pi\). Allowing finite mass in the calculation may regularize this divergence. Because \(m=0\) is the limit for \(\ecm\rightarrow\infty\), the cross section would still have strong peaks for angles near \(0,\pi\) at high energies so that the result is not altogether nonphysical. The divergence of the cross section itself is also not the problem here, because it can be transformed into a form where the divergence does not occur (see \cref{eq:xs-eta}). The differential cross section is clearly symmetric around \(\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}\) as was to be expected\footnote{Such properties are very handy and intuitive checks for calculations along the way.}, because the photons are indistinguishable. To compare the cross section to experiment and to simulation an interval around \(\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}\) has to be chosen, where the first order, mass-less approximation may yield a physical result. The total cross section in such an interval, given by integrating \cref{eq:crossec} for \(\theta\in [\theta_1, \theta_2]\) or \(\eta\in [\eta_1, \eta_2]\) is given in \cref{eq:total-crossec}. \begin{equation} \label{eq:total-crossec} \begin{split} \sigma &= 2\pi\mathfrak{C}\cdot\qty{\cos(\theta_2)-\cos(\theta_1)+2\qty[\artanh(\cos(\theta_1)) - \artanh(\cos(\theta_2))]} \\ &=2\pi\mathfrak{C}\cdot\qty[\tanh(\eta_2) - \tanh(\eta_1) + 2(\eta_1 - \eta_2))] \\ &={\frac{\pi\alpha^2Z^4}{3\ecm^2}}\cdot\qty[\tanh(\eta_2) - \tanh(\eta_1) + 2(\eta_1 - \eta_2))] \end{split} \end{equation} As can be seen in \cref{fig:totxs}, the cross section, integrated over an interval of \([-\eta, \eta]\), is dominated by the linear contributions in \cref{eq:total-crossec} and would result in an infinity if no cut on \(\eta\) would be made. Choosing \(\eta\in [-2.5,2.5]\) and \(\ecm=\SI{100}{\giga\electronvolt}\) the process was monte carlo integrated in \sherpa\ using the runcard in \cref{sec:qqggruncard}. This runcard describes the exact same (first order) process as the calculated cross section. \sherpa\ arrives at the cross section \result{xs/sherpa_xs}. Plugging the same parameters into \cref{eq:total-crossec} gives \result{xs/python/xs} which is within the uncertainty range of the \sherpa\ value. This verifies the result for the total cross section. %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: latex %%% TeX-master: "../../document" %%% End: