mirror of
https://github.com/vale981/bachelor_thesis
synced 2025-03-05 09:31:42 -05:00
mehr schnitzer
This commit is contained in:
parent
6853669e3a
commit
7ac62942cc
2 changed files with 13 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -2,11 +2,10 @@
|
|||
\label{sec:pdf_basics}
|
||||
|
||||
Parton Density Functions encode, restricting considerations to leading
|
||||
order, the probability to encounter a constituent parton (quark or
|
||||
gluon) of a hadron with a certain momentum fraction \(x\) at a certain
|
||||
factorization scale \(Q^2\) in a scattering process. PDFs are
|
||||
normalized according to \cref{eq:pdf-norm}, where the sum runs over
|
||||
all partons.
|
||||
order, the probability to encounter a constituent parton of a hadron
|
||||
with a certain momentum fraction \(x\) at a certain factorization
|
||||
scale \(Q^2\) in a scattering process. PDFs are normalized according
|
||||
to \cref{eq:pdf-norm}, where the sum runs over all partons.
|
||||
%
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:pdf-norm}
|
||||
|
@ -16,15 +15,15 @@ all partons.
|
|||
More precisely \({f_i}\) denotes a PDF set, which is referred to
|
||||
simply as PDF in the following. PDFs can not be derived from first
|
||||
principles and have to be determined experimentally for low \(Q^2\)
|
||||
and are evolved to higher \(Q^2\) through the \emph{DGLAP}
|
||||
and can be evolved to higher \(Q^2\) through the \emph{DGLAP}
|
||||
equations~\cite{altarelli:1977af} at different orders of perturbation
|
||||
theory. In deep inelastic scattering \(Q^2\) is just the negative
|
||||
over the momentum transfer \(-q^2\). For more complicated processes
|
||||
over the momentum transfer: \(-q^2\). For more complicated processes
|
||||
\(Q^2\) has to be chosen in a way that reflects the
|
||||
\emph{energy-momentum scale} of the process. If the perturbation
|
||||
series behind the process would be expanded to the exact solution, the
|
||||
dependence on the factorization scale vanishes. In lower orders, one
|
||||
has to choose the scale in a \emph{physically
|
||||
dependence on the factorization scale would vanish. In lower orders,
|
||||
one has to choose the scale in a \emph{physically
|
||||
meaningful}\footnote{That means: not in an arbitrary way.} way,
|
||||
which reflects characteristics of the process~\cite{altarelli:1977af}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -45,7 +44,7 @@ scale\footnote{More appropriately: The factorization scale depends on
|
|||
%
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:pdf-xs}
|
||||
\sigma = \int f_i\qty(x;Q^2) f_j\qty(x;Q^2) \hat{\sigma}_{ij}\qty(x_1,
|
||||
\sigma = \int f_i\qty(x_1;Q^2) f_j\qty(x_2;Q^2) \hat{\sigma}_{ij}\qty(x_1,
|
||||
x_2, Q^2)\dd{x_1}\dd{x_2}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ experiment, even with this simple leading-order process.
|
|||
|
||||
The integrand in \cref{eq:pdf-xs} can be concertized into
|
||||
\cref{eq:weighteddist}, where \(q\) runs over all quarks (except the
|
||||
top quark). The sum has been symmetized, otherwise a double sum with
|
||||
top quark). The sum has been symmetrized, otherwise a double sum with
|
||||
\(q\) and \(\bar{q}\) would have been necessary. The choice of \(Q^2\)
|
||||
is justified in \cref{sec:pdf_basics} and formulated in
|
||||
\cref{eq:q2-explicit}.
|
||||
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ is justified in \cref{sec:pdf_basics} and formulated in
|
|||
Q^2 = 2x_1x_2E_p^2
|
||||
\end{gather}
|
||||
%
|
||||
The PDF set being used in the following has been fitted (and
|
||||
The PDF set that is being used in the following has been fitted (and
|
||||
\emph{DGLAP} developed) at leading order and is the central member of
|
||||
the PDF set \verb|NNPDF31_lo_as_0118| provided by \emph{NNPDF}
|
||||
collaboration and accessed through the \lhapdf\
|
||||
|
@ -253,3 +253,5 @@ imposed alter the distribution quite considerably, cutting of the
|
|||
%%% mode: latex
|
||||
%%% TeX-master: "../../document"
|
||||
%%% End:
|
||||
|
||||
% LocalWords: symmetrized
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue