add stuff about toy generator and pheno

This commit is contained in:
hiro98 2020-06-19 19:15:17 +02:00
parent f472209ff4
commit 1d48c554b2

View file

@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ What the heck should be in there. Let's draft up an outline.
** Importance of MC Methods :SHORT:
- important tool in particle physics
- not just numerical
- also applications in stat. phys and lattice QCD
- somewhat romenatic: distilling information with entropy
- validation of new theories
- some predictions are often more subtle than just the existense of
@ -159,14 +160,111 @@ What the heck should be in there. Let's draft up an outline.
* Toy Event Generator
** Basics :SHORT:
- just sampling the hard xs not realistic
1. free quarks do not occur in nature
2. hadron interaction more complicated in general
- we address the first problem here
- quarks in protons: no analytical bound state solution known so-far
*** Parton Density Functions
- in leading order, high momentum limit: propability to encounter
parton at some energy scale with some momentum fraction
- can not be calcualated from first principles
- have to be fitted from exp. data
- can be evolved to other Q^2 with DGLAP
- *calculated* with lattice QCQ: very recently
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02102
- scale has to be chosen appropriately: in deep inelastic scattering
-> momentum transfer
- p_T good choice
- here s/2 (mean of t and u in this case)
- xs formula
- here LO fit and evolution of PDFs
**** TODO check s/2
** Implementation
- find xs in lab frame
- impose more cuts
- guarantee applicability of massless limit
- satisfy experimental requirements
- used vegas to integrate
- cuts now more complicated because photons not back to back
- apply stratified sampling variant along with VEGAS
- 3 dimensions: x1, x2 (symmetric), η
- use VEGAS to find grid, grid-weights and maxima
- improve maxima by gradient ascend (usually very fast)
- improve performance by cythonizing the xs and cut computation
- sampling routines JIT compiled with numba, especially performant
for loops and /very/ easy
- trivial parallelism through python multiprocessing
- overestimating the maxima corrects for numerical maximization
error
- assumptions: mc found maximum and VEGAS weights are precise enough
- most time consuming part: multidimensional implementation + debugging
- along the way: validation of kinematics and PDF values through sherpa
** Results
*** Integration with VEGAS
- Python Tax: very slow, parallelism implemented, but omitted due
to complications with the PDF library
- also very inefficient memory management :P
- result compatible with sherpa
- that was the easy part
*** Sampling and Observables
- observables:
- usual: η and cosθ
- p_t of one photon and invariant mass are more interesting
- influence of PDF:
- more weight to the central angles (see eta)
- p_t cutoff due to cuts, very steep falloff due to pdf
- same picture in inv mass
- compatibilty problematic: just within acceptable limits
- for p_t and inv mass: low statistic and very steep falloff
- very sensitive to uncertainties of weights (can be improved by
improving accuracy of VEGAS)
- prompts a more rigorous study of uncertainties in the vegas step!
* Pheno Stuff
** Shortcomings of the Toy Generator
** Short review of HO Effects
** Presentation and Discussion of selected Histograms
- non LO effects completely neglected
- sherpa generator allows to model some of them
- always approximations
** Short review of HO Effects
- always introduce stage and effects along with the nice event
picture
*** LO
- same as toy generator
*** LO+PS
- parton shower ~CSS~ (dipole) activated
- radiation of gluons, and splitting into quarks -> shower like
cascades QCD
- as there are no QCD particles in FS: initial state radiation
- due to 4-mom conservation: recoil momenta (and energies)
*** LO+PS+pT
- beam remnants and primordial transverse momenta simulated
- additinal radiation and parton showers
- primordial p_T due to localization of quarks, modeled like gaussian
distribution
- mean, sigma: .8 GeV, standard values in sherpa
- consistent with the notion of "fermi motion"
*** LO+PS+pT+Hadronization
- AHADIC activated (cluster hadr)
- jets of parton cluster into hadrons: non perturbative
- models inspired by qcd but still just models
- mainly affects isolation of photons (come back to that)
- in sherpa, unstable are being decayed (using lookup tables) with
correct kinematics
*** LO+PS+pT+Hadronization+MI
- Multiple Interactions (AMISIC) turned on
- no reason for just one single scattering in event
- based on overlap of hadrons and the most important QCD scattering
processes
- in sherpa: shower corrections
- generally more particles in FS, affects isolation
** Presentation and Discussion of selected Histograms
* Wrap-Up
** Summary
** Lessons Learned (if any)