mirror of
https://github.com/vale981/bachelor_thesis
synced 2025-03-05 17:41:41 -05:00
add stuff about toy generator and pheno
This commit is contained in:
parent
f472209ff4
commit
1d48c554b2
1 changed files with 101 additions and 3 deletions
104
talk/vortrag.org
104
talk/vortrag.org
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ What the heck should be in there. Let's draft up an outline.
|
||||||
** Importance of MC Methods :SHORT:
|
** Importance of MC Methods :SHORT:
|
||||||
- important tool in particle physics
|
- important tool in particle physics
|
||||||
- not just numerical
|
- not just numerical
|
||||||
|
- also applications in stat. phys and lattice QCD
|
||||||
- somewhat romenatic: distilling information with entropy
|
- somewhat romenatic: distilling information with entropy
|
||||||
- validation of new theories
|
- validation of new theories
|
||||||
- some predictions are often more subtle than just the existense of
|
- some predictions are often more subtle than just the existense of
|
||||||
|
@ -159,14 +160,111 @@ What the heck should be in there. Let's draft up an outline.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Toy Event Generator
|
* Toy Event Generator
|
||||||
** Basics :SHORT:
|
** Basics :SHORT:
|
||||||
|
- just sampling the hard xs not realistic
|
||||||
|
1. free quarks do not occur in nature
|
||||||
|
2. hadron interaction more complicated in general
|
||||||
|
- we address the first problem here
|
||||||
|
- quarks in protons: no analytical bound state solution known so-far
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*** Parton Density Functions
|
||||||
|
- in leading order, high momentum limit: propability to encounter
|
||||||
|
parton at some energy scale with some momentum fraction
|
||||||
|
- can not be calcualated from first principles
|
||||||
|
- have to be fitted from exp. data
|
||||||
|
- can be evolved to other Q^2 with DGLAP
|
||||||
|
- *calculated* with lattice QCQ: very recently
|
||||||
|
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02102
|
||||||
|
- scale has to be chosen appropriately: in deep inelastic scattering
|
||||||
|
-> momentum transfer
|
||||||
|
- p_T good choice
|
||||||
|
- here s/2 (mean of t and u in this case)
|
||||||
|
- xs formula
|
||||||
|
- here LO fit and evolution of PDFs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**** TODO check s/2
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** Implementation
|
** Implementation
|
||||||
|
- find xs in lab frame
|
||||||
|
- impose more cuts
|
||||||
|
- guarantee applicability of massless limit
|
||||||
|
- satisfy experimental requirements
|
||||||
|
- used vegas to integrate
|
||||||
|
- cuts now more complicated because photons not back to back
|
||||||
|
- apply stratified sampling variant along with VEGAS
|
||||||
|
- 3 dimensions: x1, x2 (symmetric), η
|
||||||
|
- use VEGAS to find grid, grid-weights and maxima
|
||||||
|
- improve maxima by gradient ascend (usually very fast)
|
||||||
|
- improve performance by cythonizing the xs and cut computation
|
||||||
|
- sampling routines JIT compiled with numba, especially performant
|
||||||
|
for loops and /very/ easy
|
||||||
|
- trivial parallelism through python multiprocessing
|
||||||
|
- overestimating the maxima corrects for numerical maximization
|
||||||
|
error
|
||||||
|
- assumptions: mc found maximum and VEGAS weights are precise enough
|
||||||
|
- most time consuming part: multidimensional implementation + debugging
|
||||||
|
- along the way: validation of kinematics and PDF values through sherpa
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** Results
|
** Results
|
||||||
|
*** Integration with VEGAS
|
||||||
|
- Python Tax: very slow, parallelism implemented, but omitted due
|
||||||
|
to complications with the PDF library
|
||||||
|
- also very inefficient memory management :P
|
||||||
|
- result compatible with sherpa
|
||||||
|
- that was the easy part
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*** Sampling and Observables
|
||||||
|
- observables:
|
||||||
|
- usual: η and cosθ
|
||||||
|
- p_t of one photon and invariant mass are more interesting
|
||||||
|
- influence of PDF:
|
||||||
|
- more weight to the central angles (see eta)
|
||||||
|
- p_t cutoff due to cuts, very steep falloff due to pdf
|
||||||
|
- same picture in inv mass
|
||||||
|
- compatibilty problematic: just within acceptable limits
|
||||||
|
- for p_t and inv mass: low statistic and very steep falloff
|
||||||
|
- very sensitive to uncertainties of weights (can be improved by
|
||||||
|
improving accuracy of VEGAS)
|
||||||
|
- prompts a more rigorous study of uncertainties in the vegas step!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Pheno Stuff
|
* Pheno Stuff
|
||||||
** Shortcomings of the Toy Generator
|
- non LO effects completely neglected
|
||||||
** Short review of HO Effects
|
- sherpa generator allows to model some of them
|
||||||
** Presentation and Discussion of selected Histograms
|
- always approximations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
** Short review of HO Effects
|
||||||
|
- always introduce stage and effects along with the nice event
|
||||||
|
picture
|
||||||
|
*** LO
|
||||||
|
- same as toy generator
|
||||||
|
*** LO+PS
|
||||||
|
- parton shower ~CSS~ (dipole) activated
|
||||||
|
- radiation of gluons, and splitting into quarks -> shower like
|
||||||
|
cascades QCD
|
||||||
|
- as there are no QCD particles in FS: initial state radiation
|
||||||
|
- due to 4-mom conservation: recoil momenta (and energies)
|
||||||
|
*** LO+PS+pT
|
||||||
|
- beam remnants and primordial transverse momenta simulated
|
||||||
|
- additinal radiation and parton showers
|
||||||
|
- primordial p_T due to localization of quarks, modeled like gaussian
|
||||||
|
distribution
|
||||||
|
- mean, sigma: .8 GeV, standard values in sherpa
|
||||||
|
- consistent with the notion of "fermi motion"
|
||||||
|
*** LO+PS+pT+Hadronization
|
||||||
|
- AHADIC activated (cluster hadr)
|
||||||
|
- jets of parton cluster into hadrons: non perturbative
|
||||||
|
- models inspired by qcd but still just models
|
||||||
|
- mainly affects isolation of photons (come back to that)
|
||||||
|
- in sherpa, unstable are being decayed (using lookup tables) with
|
||||||
|
correct kinematics
|
||||||
|
*** LO+PS+pT+Hadronization+MI
|
||||||
|
- Multiple Interactions (AMISIC) turned on
|
||||||
|
- no reason for just one single scattering in event
|
||||||
|
- based on overlap of hadrons and the most important QCD scattering
|
||||||
|
processes
|
||||||
|
- in sherpa: shower corrections
|
||||||
|
- generally more particles in FS, affects isolation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
** Presentation and Discussion of selected Histograms
|
||||||
* Wrap-Up
|
* Wrap-Up
|
||||||
** Summary
|
** Summary
|
||||||
** Lessons Learned (if any)
|
** Lessons Learned (if any)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue