mirror of
https://github.com/vale981/bachelor_thesis
synced 2025-03-04 17:11:39 -05:00
add stuff about toy generator and pheno
This commit is contained in:
parent
f472209ff4
commit
1d48c554b2
1 changed files with 101 additions and 3 deletions
104
talk/vortrag.org
104
talk/vortrag.org
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ What the heck should be in there. Let's draft up an outline.
|
|||
** Importance of MC Methods :SHORT:
|
||||
- important tool in particle physics
|
||||
- not just numerical
|
||||
- also applications in stat. phys and lattice QCD
|
||||
- somewhat romenatic: distilling information with entropy
|
||||
- validation of new theories
|
||||
- some predictions are often more subtle than just the existense of
|
||||
|
@ -159,14 +160,111 @@ What the heck should be in there. Let's draft up an outline.
|
|||
|
||||
* Toy Event Generator
|
||||
** Basics :SHORT:
|
||||
- just sampling the hard xs not realistic
|
||||
1. free quarks do not occur in nature
|
||||
2. hadron interaction more complicated in general
|
||||
- we address the first problem here
|
||||
- quarks in protons: no analytical bound state solution known so-far
|
||||
|
||||
*** Parton Density Functions
|
||||
- in leading order, high momentum limit: propability to encounter
|
||||
parton at some energy scale with some momentum fraction
|
||||
- can not be calcualated from first principles
|
||||
- have to be fitted from exp. data
|
||||
- can be evolved to other Q^2 with DGLAP
|
||||
- *calculated* with lattice QCQ: very recently
|
||||
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02102
|
||||
- scale has to be chosen appropriately: in deep inelastic scattering
|
||||
-> momentum transfer
|
||||
- p_T good choice
|
||||
- here s/2 (mean of t and u in this case)
|
||||
- xs formula
|
||||
- here LO fit and evolution of PDFs
|
||||
|
||||
**** TODO check s/2
|
||||
|
||||
** Implementation
|
||||
- find xs in lab frame
|
||||
- impose more cuts
|
||||
- guarantee applicability of massless limit
|
||||
- satisfy experimental requirements
|
||||
- used vegas to integrate
|
||||
- cuts now more complicated because photons not back to back
|
||||
- apply stratified sampling variant along with VEGAS
|
||||
- 3 dimensions: x1, x2 (symmetric), η
|
||||
- use VEGAS to find grid, grid-weights and maxima
|
||||
- improve maxima by gradient ascend (usually very fast)
|
||||
- improve performance by cythonizing the xs and cut computation
|
||||
- sampling routines JIT compiled with numba, especially performant
|
||||
for loops and /very/ easy
|
||||
- trivial parallelism through python multiprocessing
|
||||
- overestimating the maxima corrects for numerical maximization
|
||||
error
|
||||
- assumptions: mc found maximum and VEGAS weights are precise enough
|
||||
- most time consuming part: multidimensional implementation + debugging
|
||||
- along the way: validation of kinematics and PDF values through sherpa
|
||||
|
||||
** Results
|
||||
*** Integration with VEGAS
|
||||
- Python Tax: very slow, parallelism implemented, but omitted due
|
||||
to complications with the PDF library
|
||||
- also very inefficient memory management :P
|
||||
- result compatible with sherpa
|
||||
- that was the easy part
|
||||
|
||||
*** Sampling and Observables
|
||||
- observables:
|
||||
- usual: η and cosθ
|
||||
- p_t of one photon and invariant mass are more interesting
|
||||
- influence of PDF:
|
||||
- more weight to the central angles (see eta)
|
||||
- p_t cutoff due to cuts, very steep falloff due to pdf
|
||||
- same picture in inv mass
|
||||
- compatibilty problematic: just within acceptable limits
|
||||
- for p_t and inv mass: low statistic and very steep falloff
|
||||
- very sensitive to uncertainties of weights (can be improved by
|
||||
improving accuracy of VEGAS)
|
||||
- prompts a more rigorous study of uncertainties in the vegas step!
|
||||
|
||||
* Pheno Stuff
|
||||
** Shortcomings of the Toy Generator
|
||||
** Short review of HO Effects
|
||||
** Presentation and Discussion of selected Histograms
|
||||
- non LO effects completely neglected
|
||||
- sherpa generator allows to model some of them
|
||||
- always approximations
|
||||
|
||||
** Short review of HO Effects
|
||||
- always introduce stage and effects along with the nice event
|
||||
picture
|
||||
*** LO
|
||||
- same as toy generator
|
||||
*** LO+PS
|
||||
- parton shower ~CSS~ (dipole) activated
|
||||
- radiation of gluons, and splitting into quarks -> shower like
|
||||
cascades QCD
|
||||
- as there are no QCD particles in FS: initial state radiation
|
||||
- due to 4-mom conservation: recoil momenta (and energies)
|
||||
*** LO+PS+pT
|
||||
- beam remnants and primordial transverse momenta simulated
|
||||
- additinal radiation and parton showers
|
||||
- primordial p_T due to localization of quarks, modeled like gaussian
|
||||
distribution
|
||||
- mean, sigma: .8 GeV, standard values in sherpa
|
||||
- consistent with the notion of "fermi motion"
|
||||
*** LO+PS+pT+Hadronization
|
||||
- AHADIC activated (cluster hadr)
|
||||
- jets of parton cluster into hadrons: non perturbative
|
||||
- models inspired by qcd but still just models
|
||||
- mainly affects isolation of photons (come back to that)
|
||||
- in sherpa, unstable are being decayed (using lookup tables) with
|
||||
correct kinematics
|
||||
*** LO+PS+pT+Hadronization+MI
|
||||
- Multiple Interactions (AMISIC) turned on
|
||||
- no reason for just one single scattering in event
|
||||
- based on overlap of hadrons and the most important QCD scattering
|
||||
processes
|
||||
- in sherpa: shower corrections
|
||||
- generally more particles in FS, affects isolation
|
||||
|
||||
** Presentation and Discussion of selected Histograms
|
||||
* Wrap-Up
|
||||
** Summary
|
||||
** Lessons Learned (if any)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue