This mostly reverts fd34771841 along with a
number of slight adjustments to avoid other typing luxuries which were
introduced with TypeScript 3.x.
While the generic `ServerOptionFunction` types and `HandlerArguments`
generic rest argument type were certainly welcome additions to the codebase,
they present a backwards compatibility problem for consumers of Apollo
Server who have not yet made the jump to TypeScript 3.x.
With any luck, when we bump the major version of Apollo Server to 3.x, and
in accordance with semantic versioning, we'll be in the position to
straight-up revert this commit.
This wasn't currently being exported, but this in-between commit will make
sure that the commit which follows this can be reverted without
inadvertently dropping this export.
This commit follows-up on #1795, which introduced the new request pipeline, and
implements the triggers for its new life-cycle hooks within the various
integration packages. Previously, the only implementation was within the
`apollo-server` package and didn't get triggered for those invoking the
`applyMiddleware` method on integrations (e.g. `apollo-server-express`,
`...-hapi` and `...-koa`).
While in an ideal world, ALL existing `applyMiddleware` functions would be
marked as `async` functions and allow us to `await ApolloServer#willStart`,
in practice the only `applyMiddleware` which is currently `async` is the one
within the Hapi implementation. Therefore, we'll instead kick off the
`willStart` lifecycle hook as soon as `applyMiddleware` is started, return
as quickly as we have before and then (essentially) yield the completion of
Apollo Server's `willStart` prior to serving the first request — thus
ensuring the completion of server-startup activities.
Similarly, we'll do the same for `createHandler` methods on integrations
which don't utilize Node.js server frameworks but don't have `async`
handlers (e.g. AWS, Lambda, etc.).
In the same manner as AWS Lambda, this now utilizes the
`ServerOptionsFunction` type pattern. Previously, this typing still appears
to be incorrect, but that incorrectness was being missed because the
sole invocation of this at the end of this integrations `createHandler`
method was utilizing `this.createGraphQLServerOptions.bind(this)`, whose
types were unable to be inferred. (I'm making a slight assumption on this
last bit because this mis-typing only surfaced after I switched to a more
explicit notation, but I believe this to be true).
We can't use `apollo-server-env` as a project reference because that requires `composite: true`, and that implies `declaration: true`, which doesn't work for `apollo-server-env` because we need to write our own declaration files for re-exported imports.
This commit also removes `apollo-engine-reporting-protobuf` as a reference, which errored out because it doesn't actually contain any TypeScript code.
I'm reverting apollographql/apollo-server#1698 not because it's been problematic in any way, but because I'd like to give it a bit more thought and don't want this to accidentally get cut into a release prior to that consideration.
More specifically: The `graphql-tools` update on its own shouldn't really cause any problems, but the [4.x version of `graphql-tools`](https://github.com/apollographql/graphql-tools/releases/tag/4.0.0) is intended to support and enable the latest `graphql@14` which contains [breaking changes](https://github.com/graphql/graphql-js/releases/tag/v14.0.0).
I believe most of those breaking changes would be show-stoppers and the failures would surface immediately (meaning that servers would completely fail to start, rather than being a surprise in other, more delayed scenarios), but it's still worth pausing and carefully considering versioning to avoid any surprises.
That said, the 14.x version of `graphql` has been an acceptable range in the `peerDependencies` of `apollo-server-*` since before its final release came out, and I don't believe we've caught wind of anything that a major version bump would have prevented or made more clear. In the end, `graphql` is a peer dependency and any problems should only surface if consumers also update their `graphql` dependency — a clear major version bump, which deserves review by the upgrader — so perhaps we can avoid bumping the major version after all?
Input welcomed, but again, merging this now to give this a bit more thought first.
cc @hwillson
* Updated request handler to handle null or undefined req.path
* Added test for GCF handling request.path being null
* Updated Changelog
* Add note about checking for null path
* Initial implementation of Apollo Server 2 for gcf
* First try at running with tests
* Updated naming
* Removed lambda mentions
* Simply use referer
* Updated README
* Updated Changelog
* Renamed gqlApollo to googleCloudApollo
* Added more details
* Removed extra check